Yesterday, February 7, 2012, marked a huge victory for both human rights activists and non-heterosexual couples in California and the U.S. at large. (If you are curious as to why I chose the term “non-heterosexual” rather than “gay” or “homosexual,” it is because not everyone who enters into a relationship with someone of the same gender identifies as “gay;” some identify as queer, bisexual, pansexual or do not identify at all. “Non-heterosexual,” then, encompasses everything that simply isn’t “straight.”)
In a momentous 2-1 decision, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared Proposition 8, the California amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, to be unconstitutional, serving no purpose other than to “lessen the status and human dignity” of the LGBTQ community.
Proposition 8, or the “Marriage Protection Act,” was passed by California state voters in November of 2008, adding a new provision to the California Constitution which upholds that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” Both proponents and opponents of Prop 8 worked tirelessly for the months leading up to Election Day to get their messages to voters, and actually managed to set a record with the contributions they received. Contributions totaled over $83 million, $39.9 million for those in favor, $43.3 million for those against, and came from over 64,000 people in all fifty states and more than twenty foreign countries, setting a new national record for a social policy initiative and trumping every other race in the country in spending except the presidential contest. In the end, however, Prop 8 was passed.
Continue reading ‘California’s Ruling on Prop 8: The Day in Quotes’















Encyclopedia & Reference Resource